The Folk Dance of Nonprofit Organizational Development

FolkDance-FlickrCommonsI was honored to be part of the 501 Mission Place team. This article was orginally published in the 501 Mission Place forum.


The Folk Dance of Nonprofit Organizational Development

by , FundraisingCoach.com

The first three to four years of a nonprofit is a startup phase. Things are gloriously crazing. People are living on a dream. The possibilities are endless. The adrenaline is flowing. The nonprofit is the team’s life. They live, eat, and breath the cause.

Startups are fun, chaotic, and exciting times.

About 3-4 years in, people start getting tired. While they often don’t say it, you notice people stop showing up to things. They talk about being committed to the cause but also “having a life.” Board members start resigning.

How you respond at this point determines whether your nonprofit will survive.

I see two very common reactions at this stage: anger and fear. Symptoms of either can show up in both nonprofit staff and in their boards.

Anger is usually expressed by the remaining players describing those dropping off as “lacking commitment” or “not being serious.” They are hurt that people would leave. Sometimes deeply hurt. So they start building protective walls around themselves. They question everyone’s loyalty and make people live up to an exceedingly burdensome list of requirements. As a result, more people leave and the requirements get even tighter.

Fear is often exhibited by worry that the nonprofit is doomed. People start muttering things like, “At this rate, we’ll be lucky to last another two years” and “Maybe we should start talks with XYZ nonprofit to see if we can merge with them.”

Both fear and anger are natural reactions. But if left unchecked, both will kill an organization.

Fortunately, there is a third way. I like to think of this stage as a folk dance.

In formal ballroom dancing, you basically stay with the same dance partner all night. Most beginning nonprofits seem to expect this for their organizational development: the team that launches the organization will be the same team in 10 years.

But that doesn’t happen. I find it easier to think of organizational development as a folk dance. I’m not a dance expert, but when I think of a typical folk dance, I think of constant changing and motion. People swirl around each other, dancing with everyone in the room. There’s grace and beauty, levity and joy.

That’s all that is really going on at 3-4 years. The dance partners are changing.

When I was studying the process of church planting–starting faith communities from scratch–my mentor told me there were three types of people needed to establish reproducing faith communities:

  1. Pioneers
  2. Administrators
  3. Maintainers

I believe these categories fit most nonprofits.

Pioneers love the chaos and excitement of the start up. They get energy from it and are highly functional in that environment. They’re also the smallest percent of the population. Chaos confuses most people (at best) and burns them out or turns them off.

At the 3-4 year point, the nonprofit needs to start attracting administrators: people who are uniquely gifted to make order out of chaos. These are the people that set up HR policies and regular office hours. They establish regular communication patterns with the board and the donors.

They are also the people that irritate pioneers. Highly developed pioneers can see their benefit. But less mature pioneers feel administrators are “limiting creativity” and “killing the spirit” and more or less ruining whatever good the nonprofit was doing.

Of course, they’re not. They are creating a structure that will help the nonprofit survive for the long haul. Long after the pioneers are on to their next startup. The structures administrators set up are easily run by maintainers.

There are more maintainers than there are pioneers or administrators. Nonprofit certificate programs and graduate degree programs are mostly set up to turn out maintainers.

So the folk dance looks like this:

  • Pioneers see a need and create activity and impact
  • Administrators make order out of that activity, increasing the nonprofit’s ability to have long-term impact
  • And maintainers ensure the impact keeps getting made in new and better ways

Do you see the dance? This dance is happening both at the board level and the staff leadership level. Each transition is unsettling. Each new dance partner takes getting used to. But each one is as committed to creating the long-term impact as the previous one.

So if you’re in a start-up and are nearing the 3-4 year mark, don’t freak out if people start moving on. Instead, try to get them to bring administrators on before they leave!

How about you? Does this folk dance analogy resonate with your experience?

About Marc A. Pitman

Marc A. Pitman is the author of "Ask Without Fear!" and founder of FundraisingCoach.com and the weekly email service “Fundraising Kick.” Marc's expertise and enthusiasm engages audiences around the world and has caught the attention of media organizations as diverse as Al Jazeera and Fox News. Marc’s experience also includes pastoring a Vineyard church, managing a gubernatorial campaign, and teaching internet marketing at Thomas College. He is the husband to his best friend and the father of three amazing kids. And if you drive by him on the road, he’ll be singing 80’s tunes loud enough to embarrass his family!

Follow him on Google+, on Twitter @marcapitman, and like "Ask Without Fear!" on Facebook.

Comments

  1. WOW! This one resonates heavily…. four and bit years into the development of our non-profit and this scenario is taking shape… needing to recruit new board members and a few solid administrators…

  2. Marc, how would your pioneers, administrators, and maintainers function at each of the Fieldstone Alliance’s five nonprofit life stages…

    http://www.fieldstonealliance.org/productdetails.cfm?PC=116

    … Stage 1, Imagine and Inspire, Stage 2, Found and Frame, Stage 3, Ground and Grow, etc.?

    Also, specific to church planting, thinking in terms of the Acts 29 Network’s Prophet-Priest-King model, it seems to me Pioneer might be the match for Prophet, and King for Administrator, but I can’t figure out where Priest fits in … if at all.

    • Thanks John. I don’t know. I’m not familiar with the first model.

      As for the second, great roles but I’d be surprised if they matched exactly! I’m intrigued that 2 of the 3 do seem to line up. But priest, while managing a service, seems somewhat more textured than simple “manager”! (Although seminaries are geared to turning out managers…)

  3. J Mitchell says:

    Brilliant….thanks for providing reason to the insanity we are currently experiencing. Makes perfect sense!

Speak Your Mind

*